Remote Access Connection (RAS) over satellite on XP3

Client Machine(where I connect from) - XP Service Pack 3, PcAnywhere 10.5/11.
Host Machine(where I connect to) - XP Service Pack 3, PcAnywhere 11.

When I connect using PcAnywhere 10.5/11 to a host machine, I have problem
whereby the remote connection is super slow. When the connection is
establised, you need to count of 20 - 30 before it gets to load other
windows/screens/pages.

For your information, how the host receive a signal is via satellite. So how
I connect to the host basically, the remote access has to go through the
satellite dish > Indoor Unit (IDU) > 3Com Switch > host machine.

The response from Client to Host is very as you open a window, you can see
that immediately on Host. But to see what you have opened in Host in Client is
very slow (that is where you need to count of 20 - 30).

My question is, how can I improve the connection of the remote accessing?

Look forward to hear from anyone soon.

Thank You.

Regards, Shah
ashah.nasarudin@gmail.com

On 1/26/10, Br@bus posted:You might do better posting this in a networking or

On 1/26/10, Br@bus posted:








You might do better posting this in a networking or debugging group.

--
Gene Bloch 650.366.4267 lettersatblochg.com

Go to www.speedtest.net and choose a test server(s) near yourdestination.

Go to www.speedtest.net and choose a test server(s) near your
destination.  Try close ones too.

Report speeds back to the newsgroup...

Chances are your "pipe" is not big enough.

Post in the following news group :-http://www.microsoft.

Post in the following news group :-

http://www.microsoft.com/communities/newsgroups/en-us/default.aspx?dg=microsoft.public.windows.networking.wireless&cat=en_US_f7139501-144b-4e8e-baf9-03f78faf7e85&lang=en&cr=US

regards,
S.Sengupta[MS-MVP]



__________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature database 4808 (20100126) __________

The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.

http://www.eset.com

The machine that I connect to is a Live site.

The machine that I connect to is a Live site. There is no internet connection
that I can test on.

Anyway, I will post this question to network newsgroup

Hi Mogan,What do you mean by "Chances your "pipe" is not big enough.

Hi Mogan,

What do you mean by "Chances your "pipe" is not big enough.

How do I deal with this?

Regards, Shah

Hi Morgan,What do you mean by "Chances are your "pipe" is not big enough"How

Hi Morgan,

What do you mean by "Chances are your "pipe" is not big enough"

How do I deal with this, any idea?

Hi Morgan,What do you mean by "Chances are your "pipe" is not big enough"How

Hi Morgan,

What do you mean by "Chances are your "pipe" is not big enough"

How do I deal with this situation, any idea?

Regards, Shah

Again, you will get much better help posting in a network group instead ofthis

Again, you will get much better help posting in a network group instead of
this Media Center one.

What Morgan means is that your sat connection does not have the bandwidth to
handle a remote connection. Many sat connection have a fairly limited
download speed compared to cable or DSL and an even slower upload.
--
James
Orlando (Goofy says "Hey"), Florida

Why do you keep posting responses to Morgan's post under other people'sposts?

Why do you keep posting responses to Morgan's post under other people's
posts? If you have a reply for Morgan, post it under *his* post,
please.

On 1/27/10, Br@bus posted:






--
Gene Bloch 650.366.4267 lettersatblochg.com

Correct.Sorry, I have not checked this group for a while.

Correct.

Sorry,  I have not checked this group for a while.

You may need a faster Internet connection than what you have now.

You may need a faster Internet connection than what you have now.

Did you go to speedtest.net and get your results?

BrBus,The time lag to send a signal to a satellite and to get it back down

BrBus,
The time lag to send a signal to a satellite and to get it back down again
is very long and I do not think there is anyway you can keep the remote
access from timing out due to slow response time.

It was pretty fast when the platform was on NT."Curious" wrote:

It was pretty fast when the platform was on NT.

Ok, for the third time now....Go to:www.speedtest.

Ok, for the third time now....

Go to:

www.speedtest.net and get your actual results and post them here.

Choose a testing server that is near the remote computer.