Windows 7 - Why I Prefer Linux.
Asked By goldfarb4
06-Oct-07 05:37 PM
Linux is cheap.
IOW Linux is low cost.
I don't care how much pain my employees must endur, I am interested in
pure profit, or as most people put it, bottom line.,
Linux gives me a low cost, positive cash flow, ie: bottom line.
That's all that counts.
Go cheap and you will sleep..
That's my motto.
Saul Goldfarb
Vista
(1)
Linux
(1)
XP
(1)
NotSoBright
(1)
SuSE
(1)
VPN
(1)
PcAnyWhere
(1)
ProgDownload
(1)
Shenan Stanley replied...
So, you think that if your employees cannot produce the same quality work in
the same amount of time or less than your competition due to "how much pain
(they) must endure" due to your inflexibility and possible
incompatibilities, etc - you will still actually *make* a profit?
What is it the richer half of the population says?
'You have to spend money to make money', or something like that.
Good luck with your 'business model'. ;-)
--
Shenan Stanley
--
Jerry replied...
The thing is, no one really cares why you prefer Linux.
fourteen replied...
Linux is not cheap...it is free.
A found penny has more value.
Translator French - English - Creole replied...
which is why linux is so much better, i laugh everytime a see a fool buy a
retail or upgrade version of windows, even my folks because i know i can get
a really reliable OS depending which version of linux you get AND i don't
have a pay a dime or a penny. and i don't need a antivirus program, because
linux is so reliable, and almost no one make a linux virus. i know this by
XP, that's why even though i like not love my vista system i always have a
bootable version of linux when i want to be working for real, not just
having fun, like when i run vista.
--
Capt. Jonathan Perreault
Personnal Advice To You:
Best Comments From Users:
No Matter The Problem Even With Linux, It's Microsoft's And Windows's Faults
A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely
foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools.
John replied...
That's one hell of a sentence!
John.
fourteen replied...
I doubt you "run" anything.
You could not run on two feet.
Roy Schestowitz replied...
____/ Â Gary Stewart on Saturday 06 October 2007 22:37 : \____
Another impotent Gary Stewart (flatfish) nym.
plonk
--
~~ Best of wishes
.oÊʇ sÉ buıɥʇ ɥɔns ou s,ÇɹÇɥʇ 'ɹÇpuÇq 'ʎɹɹoÊ Ê‡,uop :ʎɹɟ
.oÊʇ É ÊÉs ı ʇɥbnoɥʇ ı puÉ ...ÇɹÇÉ¥ÊʎɹÇÊŒÇ soɹÇz puÉ sÇuo .ɯÉÇɹp 1nÉŸÊÉ uÉ
ʇÉÉ¥Ê 'É¥É¥É¥É :ɹÇpuÇq
John King replied...
Can you prove that SPAMMER?
--
John King
beerking59@oohay.com
JANA replied...
I know of companies that had problems with Linux in their operations when
they went with that attitude. The losses were greater!
Linux is an excellent operating system, and is very stable. But, it has its
place. It is best to be compatible to the rest of the world when it comes to
business!
--
JANA
_____
Linux is cheap.
IOW Linux is low cost.
I don't care how much pain my employees must endur, I am interested in
pure profit, or as most people put it, bottom line.,
Linux gives me a low cost, positive cash flow, ie: bottom line.
That's all that counts.
Go cheap and you will sleep..
That's my motto.
Saul Goldfarb
DP replied...
Geez, I am suprised at how many people thought this guy was serious.
Have the OS wars blinded us to humor and irony?
Come on, people, use your head before answering.
Jupiter Jones [MVP] replied...
This demonstrates a complete disregard for the welfare of your
employees.
If you are not the owner of that business, show your post to those
above you and the owner.
Whether you are the owner or not, show your employees this post so
they can clearly see how little you care for them.
I doubt you represent very many if any business owners who use Linux.
With that attitude, you must have a very high turn over and that
generally translates to higher costs because of training etc.
Regardless the operating system used, anyone with your attitude will
drive business costs up.
--
Jupiter Jones [MVP]
http://www3.telus.net/dandemar
http://www.dts-l.org
VanguardLH replied...
You really think no one recognizes a Google Grouping boob playing a
wannabe flamer?
Thai Berry \(U.S.\) replied...
its sad... the average IQ in here is way down there
fourteen replied...
If you stop posting, it will increase.
Take Adam NotSoBright with you
Synapse Syndrome replied...
You really fell for that one...
ss.
Lang Murphy replied...
This smells like a complete hoax. P-Uuuuuuuuu!
Lang
Telstar replied...
I award you the Ig Noble stupidest comment of the month. All hail the
stupidity!
Telstar replied...
Our implementation of Linux for sever, after changing from MS, has cost us
so much support time and grief that your statements seem ludicrous.
Homer J. Simpson replied...
I know this is a piss-poor troll, but for argument's sake, I'd say just the
amount of time your employees will have to spend on re-training and dealing
with incompatibilities between document formats (if you deal with customers
at all) will have a far larger impact on your bottom line than you stand to
benefit from using a "free" OS.
But I suppose this is a moot point if your employees also work for free, and
you happen to have an endless supply of time.
chrisv replied...
Rich replied...
You begin to see the source of many of the "problems" encountered here ;)
Rich
HeyBub replied...
You really should keep up before you call names:
http://www.vnunet.com/vnunet/news/2200614/ig-noble-award-winners
P.S.
Translator French - English - Creole replied...
that's why i made a mistake and apologied. as far as my typing i didn't know
i had gone back to school, i fail to see why you think it's so important for
me to write properly, it's not like people can't get what i'm saying. and
beside i don't really care, i'm trying to save time, that's why i type like
this.
--
Capt. Jonathan Perreault
Personnal Advice To You:
Best Comments From Users:
No Matter The Problem Even With Linux, It's Microsoft's And Windows's Faults
A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely
foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools.
John replied...
Hi,
Linux is a much more powerful, much more stable OS than MS-Windows.
There is enough opensource software, IMHO, to run a business
comfortably. I, personally, would prefer to run on Linux, rather than
Microsoft. Too many "cash registers" in the way of developing software.
Though there are some wonderful applications running on the MS platform,
I would much rather trust a stable opensource OS that actually has its
bugs fixed, over the "bottom-line" impaired OS.
Just a singular opinion,
John
Translator French - English - Creole replied...
i knew i like you from the moment i read your post. lol ha ha ha
--
New Boating Capt. Jonathan Perreault
Personnal Advice To You:
Best Comments From Users:
No Matter The Problem Even With Linux, It's Microsoft's And Windows's Faults
A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely
foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools.
Titus Pullo replied...
In my opinion, Linux is worth what you pay for it. As a hobbyist OS its fun,
but for serious work, it just isn't there. I have tried Fedora, SuSE, and
SLED 10 and none of them are really ready for the workplace. Plus Linux is
just too darn hard for the average user to administer. Want to download
software on Vista? Double click and done. On Linux? Dependency failures,
wrong software repositories, endless headache.
Alias replied...
I think if you check out Ubuntu, you will be pleasantly surprised as the
things you mention above have all be resolved.
--
Alias
To email me, remove shoes
Granny replied...
I would love to use Linux but for the work I do I need the following apps
and Linux does not provide them:
pcAnyWhere
Quickbooks
Remote Desktop Connection to a Windows computer
Connect to work via VPN.
MPEG Encoder
I've tried Ubuntu - Fedora - Open SUSE and none of them offer these
functions that are easily useable.
Alas, users like myself are stuck with Windows.
granny
norm replied...
Linux provides what it can, but some things can be had only if the
product supplier provides a version for linux. The following may or may
not be what you are looking for, but searching is easily done.
http://www.symantec.com/business/products/sysreq.jsp?pcid=1025&pvid=840_1
Need to talk to Intuit about that. Not a linux fixable issue.
Maybe this? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rdesktop
Maybe this? http://openvpn.net/
http://linux.softpedia.com/progDownload/KmPg2-MPEG2-Encoder-Download-5324.html
You are stuck only if you wish to be stuck.
--
norm
norm replied...
I wasn't the one complaining about what cannot be done. I only offered
links to possible solutions that are available in each cited complaint
(other than the intuit issue, which is not the fault of linux). Please
do not inject your "irrational response" bull into the situation. There
is nothing irrational about the response. I did not recommend linux as a
solution to anything, nor am I advocating for it. I commented in good
faith.
--
norm
denni replied...
I only commented on the error in good faith.
I am quite happy to advocate Linux or windows or anything else if it does
what the user needs.
People that aren't prepared to recommend other products aren't helpful they
are salesmen.
Installed Vista dual boot, think I screwed up! Windows 7 Hey gang, I think I have messed up here. I just installed 64 bit Vista Ultimate, retail full version, in what I thought was a dual boot environment. I added a new sata hard drive, and installed Vista on it. Now, I do not get an option when I boot to choose wich OS to boot to, it only boots into Vista. Under Vista, it shows as my C drive, I see the partion on the other hard drive my XP Pro is on, however under Vista it shows as drive E? Dangit, I thought I had read enough to know what I did something I should not have. I would sure appreciate any help here, my XP Pro is my main OS and I desperately need to be able to get back
OS: Windows XP is MUCH better than Windows Vista Windows 7 and here are just a few of the problems that prove this to be very true: 1) Incompatibility (Driver / Software handshaking issues) Nearly everything ran super smooth in XP from day one It was a root canal getting even some of the simplest software to run in Vista 2) Desktop Convolution It's a "Muddy appearance." Everything looks the same. You cannot easily an I-net site. It's a horrible experience just looking your screen. 3) Instability XP crashed on me once in over five years. Vista crashed the first day! The list goes on and on. I haven't the time to waste commenting on Gates shotty work. MS is infamous for peddling half-baked software. XP was the exception. It is wonderful. MS hit a wall with Vista, a solid cement wall. Gates should have stuck with XP and simply added features, but
XP Death Watch Windows 7 XP Death Watch http: / / www.infoworld.com / article / 08 / 05 / 27 / XP-deathwatch-T-minus-five-weeks_1.html Even though it has had its own problems of late, Windows XP remains the most-used version of Windows. The newest data from Web metrics vendor Net Applications, for example, pegs XP as driving 73 percent of the personal computers that went online last month, five times the nearest competitor, Microsoft's own Windows Vista. Which is why an impending deadline five weeks from today is important. According to Microsoft nearly seven-year-old operating system. [ Make your voice heard. Sign InfoWorld's 'Save Windows XP' petition today. ] http: / / weblog.infoworld.com / save-xp / You'll have questions as that date approaches, including whether the deadline will drive up
A note to Windows Vista Team Windows 7 I'm quite angry with Microsoft for releasing Vista before it's ready, I've wasted 8 hours of my time in a small business trying to get it to do something that XP does without fault, i.e. Unziping a file! I'm replacing my desktops with laptops and I won't be buying any more that have Vista on until Service pack 2 comes out. If I had the time, I would send the laptop back to my supplier and get another one with XP on but I've wasted well over 2 days on this new laptop. It's it can be taken back to the retailer for a refund. If everyone took back vista, Microsoft would be in a sorry state now. I'm sure it would cost more to administer that than they have generated from the sale of vista. For gods sake, make sure that "Son of Vista" works first time! I know that it's us humans that program the bugs into
Microsoft Taking Official Petitions to Keep XP Alive Windows 7 http: / / www.neowin.net / news / main / 08 / 05 / 30 / microsoft-taking-official-petitions-to-keep-xp If you can remember back a few weeks, Steve Ballmer went on record saying that Microsoft would consider extending the life of Windows XP if enough people asked for it. Afterall, many people don't want to upgrade to Windows Vista because they are perfectly content with XP. The problem was there was no way to ask for it. Sure, you could sign in for the sole purpose of requesting an extension to the retail life of Windows XP. The calls will be logged and, if enough complaints are filed, Microsoft will consider giving XP some more time (no pinky promises, though). If you wish to file an official petition yourself, you can simply call the Windows XP Home Edition support numbers for your country and let the operator know that you wish