X64
(1)
Windows
(1)
Bloch
(1)
Blake
(1)
Nitro
(1)
Vita
(1)
Mors
(1)
Hah
(1)
64 bit programs
Asked By Paul
20-Nov-09 02:04 PM

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_004B_01CA69E1.F7CE4910
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Is there any utility or program that can tell whether your system is =
using 64bit programs?
I ask because I just installed Nitro PDR Pro 6 x64 and it installed it =
in the x85 Programs Directory. There is no way I can even tell if a true =
64 bit program is actually being utilized in my 64 bit OS. I know I am =
being anal but with all the talk of 64 bit vs 32 bit, I started getting =
curious. Seems that all the big box stores sell computers mostly with =
64 bit Windows installed but a great majority of the programs are 32 bit =
(I know they do not make many).
------=_NextPart_000_004B_01CA69E1.F7CE4910
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
http-equiv=3DContent-Type>
15px"=20
id=3DMailContainerBody leftMargin=3D0 topMargin=3D0 bgColor=3D#ffffff=20
CanvasTabStop=3D"true" name=3D"Compose message area">
can tell=20
whether your system is using 64bit programs?</FONT></DIV>
PDR Pro 6 x64=20
and it installed it in the x85 Programs Directory. There is no way =
I can=20
even tell if a true 64 bit program is actually being utilized in my 64 =
bit=20
OS. I know I=92m being anal but with all the talk of 64 bit vs 32 =
bit, I=20
started getting curious. Seems that all the big box stores sell =
computers=20
mostly with 64 bit Windows installed but a great majority of the =
programs are 32=20
bit (I know they do not make many).</FONT></DIV>
------=_NextPart_000_004B_01CA69E1.F7CE4910--
What you say is largely correct. There are very few 64-bit programsyet.
Ken Blake, MVP replied to Paul
20-Nov-09 03:10 PM
What you say is largely correct. There are very few 64-bit programs
yet. That means that the advantage of 64-bit Windows is mostly
*potential* right now. I think it is good to be running 64-bit Windows
instead of 32-bit Windows, because it lets you buy and install 64-bit
software as it becomes available in the future (and almost certainly,
we will all start seeing more and more of this very soon). But do not
expect much of a performance increase until you start running 64-bit
software.
--
Ken Blake, Microsoft MVP (Windows Desktop Experience) since 2003
Please Reply to the Newsgroup
Paul wrote:Open Task Manager and look at the Processes tab.
Carl Kaufmann replied to Paul
20-Nov-09 05:23 PM
Open Task Manager and look at the Processes tab. 32-bit processes
are suffexed with "*32". Everything else is 64-bit.
start/ run type in winverif not in there right click "computer" and go to
d3aths3rver replied to Paul
20-Nov-09 06:50 PM
start/ run type in winver
if not in there right click "computer" and go to properties should tell
you there.
--
d3aths3rver
Did you mean to post in a different thread?
Gene E. Bloch replied to d3aths3rver
20-Nov-09 08:15 PM
Did you mean to post in a different thread?
--
Gene E. Bloch letters0x40blochg0x2Ecom
Hah! What a deal!
Gene E. Bloch replied to Carl Kaufmann
20-Nov-09 08:15 PM
Hah! What a deal! I never noticed this...
Thanks.
--
Gene E. Bloch letters0x40blochg0x2Ecom
What you say is largely correct. There are very few 64-bit programsyet.
Stan Starinski replied to Paul
22-Nov-09 12:20 AM
What you say is largely correct. There are very few 64-bit programs
yet. That means that the advantage of 64-bit Windows is mostly
*potential* right now. I think it is good to be running 64-bit Windows
instead of 32-bit Windows, because it lets you buy and install 64-bit
software as it becomes available in the future (and almost certainly,
we will all start seeing more and more of this very soon). But do not
expect much of a performance increase until you start running 64-bit
software.
Stan Starinski wrote this, and it somehow bypassed my kill-file:Why did you
Death replied to Stan Starinski
22-Nov-09 12:07 AM
Stan Starinski wrote this, and it somehow bypassed my kill-file:
Why did you not quote Ken Blake on that?
He said that in the same thread, you friggen moron.
--
Vita brevis breviter in brevi finietur,
Mors venit velociter quae neminem veretur.
wrote:He not only said the same thing I did, he repeated it word for word.
Ken Blake, MVP replied to Death
22-Nov-09 10:15 AM
He not only said the same thing I did, he repeated it word for word.
--
Ken Blake, Microsoft MVP (Windows Desktop Experience) since 2003
Please Reply to the Newsgroup
Ken Blake, MVP wrote:You can bet if spelling errors are less than 30% in his
Death replied to Ken Blake, MVP
22-Nov-09 11:04 AM
You can bet if spelling errors are less than 30% in his posting, it is
plagiarized.
--
Vita brevis breviter in brevi finietur,
Mors venit velociter quae neminem veretur.
LOL!
Ken Blake, MVP replied to Death
22-Nov-09 11:42 AM
LOL! But I should mention that I am very prone to making typos myself.
--
Ken Blake, Microsoft MVP (Windows Desktop Experience) since 2003
Please Reply to the Newsgroup