Ken Blake, MVP replied to Paul

What you say is largely correct. There are very few 64-bit programs
yet. That means that the advantage of 64-bit Windows is mostly
*potential* right now. I think it is good to be running 64-bit Windows
instead of 32-bit Windows, because it lets you buy and install 64-bit
software as it becomes available in the future (and almost certainly,
we will all start seeing more and more of this very soon). But do not
expect much of a performance increase until you start running 64-bit
software.

--
Ken Blake, Microsoft MVP (Windows Desktop Experience) since 2003
Please Reply to the Newsgroup

  Carl Kaufmann replied to Paul

Open Task Manager and look at the Processes tab.  32-bit processes
are suffexed with "*32".  Everything else is 64-bit.

  d3aths3rver replied to Paul

start/ run    type in winver

if not in there right click "computer" and go to properties should tell
you there.


--
d3aths3rver

  Gene E. Bloch replied to d3aths3rver

Did you mean to post in a different thread?

--
Gene E. Bloch      letters0x40blochg0x2Ecom

  Gene E. Bloch replied to Carl Kaufmann

Hah! What a deal! I never noticed this...

Thanks.

--
Gene E. Bloch      letters0x40blochg0x2Ecom

  Stan Starinski replied to Paul

What you say is largely correct. There are very few 64-bit programs
yet. That means that the advantage of 64-bit Windows is mostly
*potential* right now. I think it is good to be running 64-bit Windows
instead of 32-bit Windows, because it lets you buy and install 64-bit
software as it becomes available in the future (and almost certainly,
we will all start seeing more and more of this very soon). But do not
expect much of a performance increase until you start running 64-bit
software.

  Death replied to Stan Starinski

Stan Starinski wrote this, and it somehow bypassed my kill-file:


Why did you not quote Ken Blake on that?
He said that in the same thread, you friggen moron.

--
Vita brevis breviter in brevi finietur,
Mors venit velociter quae neminem veretur.

  Ken Blake, MVP replied to Death

He not only said the same thing I did, he repeated it word for word.

--
Ken Blake, Microsoft MVP (Windows Desktop Experience) since 2003
Please Reply to the Newsgroup

  Death replied to Ken Blake, MVP

You can bet if spelling errors are less than 30% in his posting, it is
plagiarized.

--
Vita brevis breviter in brevi finietur,
Mors venit velociter quae neminem veretur.

  Ken Blake, MVP replied to Death

LOL! But I should mention that I am very prone to making typos myself.


--
Ken Blake, Microsoft MVP (Windows Desktop Experience) since 2003
Please Reply to the Newsgroup

Error Windows 7 Please excuse my previous post, I used the wrong update number. The correct correct number is KB971657. I have tried to install this update several times but I always Configuration, Error description: Please excuse my previous post, I used the wrong update number. The correct correct number is KB971657. I have tried to install this update several times

on incoming message appears to be 2 hours back, but the outgoing message times appear correct and the computer clock (lower left) is correct. Ho do I correct the incoming message times? Windows Vista Mail Discussions VanderMolen (1) PC (1) MVP (1) MS (1) Correct (1) Message (1) Clock (1) Chances (1) Chances are, your PC's time clock has the wrong time zone. - - = 20 Gary VanderMolen, MS-MVP (Mail) outgoing = 20 correct. = 20 keywords: Time description: The time on incoming message appears to be 2 hours back, but the outgoing message times appear correct and the computer clock (lower left) is correct. Ho

Cannot correct date in windows Windows 7 My callender has changed and i cannot correct the date. I have done all the steps o correct. YEar keeps switching back to 2005 Windows Update Discussions YEar (1) Hennin (1) Callender (1 Microsoft MVP Windows Desktop Experience - Windows System & Performance - -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- My callender has changed and i cannot correct the date. I have done all the steps o correct. YEar keeps switching back to 2005 keywords: Cannot, correct, date, in, windows description: My callender has changed and i cannot correct the date. I have done all the steps o correct. YEar keeps switching back to 2005

versions in the system32 folder. However, I checked the system32 / dllcache folder and found the correct versions of the updated files there. Should the updated versions be in the dllcache folder windows \ $hf_mig$ \ *.* 6.750: KB929338 Setup encountered an error: The update.ver file is not correct. 6.969: KB929338 Setup encountered an error: The update.ver file is not correct. 7.125: KB929338 Setup encountered an error: The update.ver file is not correct. 7.172: KB929338 Setup encountered an error: The update.ver file is not correct. 7.516: KB929338 Setup encountered an error: The update.ver file is not correct. 7.719: KB929338 Setup encountered an error: The update.ver file is not correct. 7.719: KB929338 Setup encountered an error: The update.ver file is not correct. 7.891: KB929338 Setup encountered an error: The update.ver file is not correct. 8

Sounds like you do not have the correct drivers for your monitor. Windows 7 Sounds like you do not have the correct drivers for your monitor. Windows Vista Discussions Sounds (1) Correct (1) Drivers (1) On Tue, 26 Jun 2007 19:52:00 -0700, Sausageman Then you aren't using the correct drivers for your monitor or video card. You need a wide aspect ratio resolution, but those choices are not showing up because the correct drivers are not installed. - - Ken Blake, Microsoft MVP Windows - Shell / User Please Reply to the Newsgroup keywords: Sounds, like, , you, do, not, have, the, correct, drivers, for, your, monitor. description: Sounds like you do not have the correct drivers for your monitor.